我爱大红花
花红如火烧人心
暴政压逼民灰心
腐败政府伤人心
大马子民一条心
改朝换代下决心
点燃红花唤变心
茉莉花开见春天
大红花开祈变天
Saturday, April 16, 2011
造王者
造王者
Sarawak的长屋故事
只有一个字可以形容~~“悲”
人有两种需求（现代人）
Needs 和 Wants
Needs 是基本需要
水，电和遮盖。就是说，自来水，电供应和屋子。
Wants是附加需要
如滤水器，热水器，电视机，电脑，洋楼，别墅，汽车。。。
等等。
长屋
长屋里的健壮男丁
有几十万散落全马各地去赚些蝇头小利。
城市访客，
只在选举期间才能看的。可想象他们是被遗漏的一群。
但，他们却是“造王者”
造王者的“tuai”说
他只需要基本水电供，就这么多。(目前有自己的发电机)
几十年来难道州执政府给不到这些吗？
可笑的是执政者的头头已发展到国外
连太太也进口！！
无奈
简陋的长屋（不是旅游广告里那种）
单纯的土著
却好像是永远看不到明天
但，他们永远是目前执政者的票库
祈望
只希望老天有眼
唤醒这群单纯，无助的造王者
把手上一票投给
需要的人
也等于是投给自己的后代。。。
东马子民，加油！
白色
白色给人的感觉是
纯真，柔和，弱小
单纯，神圣，干净
坦白，正直，大方
如
冬天的飞雪
春天的天鹅
天上的天使
礼堂的新娘
医院的护士
但
有个
狼心狗肺，奸诈无耻
贪得无厌，只手遮天
他
污秽了白色
侵犯了白色
他
死白毛，奸白毛，贼白毛
狼白毛，伪白毛，臭白毛。。。
再骂多千万次也拔不回
套在他头上的白
只有好好利用手上的一票
把他连根拔起
让他消失
还白色一个清白
东马子民，加油！
与虎共舞 Enough is enough
与虎共舞 Enough is enough
你交我交他也交
多交少交逼定交
早交迟交还是交
内陆税务准时交
你选我选他也选
退选中选逼定选
早选迟选还是选
四年一到准时选
不看男女
不看肥瘦
不看高矮
不看肤色
你全年收入一跨过税收底线
不管你欢喜不欢喜
民联，国阵或独立
全民都要交
这叫国民义务
全国大选每四年一次
四年一到
不管你欢喜不欢喜
民联，国阵或独立
全部得重选
这叫国家宪法
以上是一个马来西亚的写照
名府其实的一个马来西亚
但事实不是这样~~
五十四的年执政
五十四的年腐败
五十四年的宠坏
政府与政党已混乱不清了
军警与其他政府部门已成为了
执政党的私家财产
在野党就变成了外来的怀孩子
你在外面吵吵闹闹，它放狗咬你
你在外面要东要西，它用水射你
你在外面再大吵闹，它关你笼里
它不喜欢的人，就来个七挡八挡
它不爽的传媒，就来个七关八关
这是什么世界啊??
我们年年交税呵！！
他们吃的，穿的，用的。。。
都是大马子民的血汗钱
汗颜吗？
别再说记得那钱是谁给的
别再说是谁发展的
别再说，别再说。。。
Enough is enough!!
Monday, March 21, 2011
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Saturday, March 19, 2011
Nonsense
地狱夫人（寄给那及丞相）
天灵灵， 地灵灵；天在转，地在鸣
孟苦妮， 在何方；孤魂游，离故乡
妙女郎， 变粹尸；客家话，死火了
国丑事， 无头案；要有钱，就好办
世间有位“第一夫人”千斤压顶似泰山
阴间有位“地狱夫人”清明时节暗思念
Penang Boleh
送棺论
光大最高，槟州之骄；苍佑之功，名流千古
民联理政，有目共睹；民政前朝，回归无路
冠英在上，污桶不顺；子根喝恨，中央代补
送棺送冠，全马之冠；无风无浪，槟威数一
棺棺相扶，蠢材当道；五四年来， 朋党得道
侍卫瞎眼，判官失忆；明福疑案，何时了结。
天啊！真是。。。
和尚撑伞，无法无天！！罗斯马撑伞，阴公！那及撑伞，妻凉！
Fortune Teller
摸骨，器官，相命曲
眼高，眼低，被人批
手长，手短，被人玩
心静，心乱，防暗算
腰粗，腰细，防固醇
耳大，耳小，现聪愚
鼻丰，鼻塌，现风流
肤白，肤暗，是天生
发密，发陋，是营养
脚脏，脚洁，论懒勤
口臭，口香，论口德
算命佬，以此为准，包没错。。。
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Friday, July 30, 2010
Friday, July 16, 2010
Tuesday, July 6, 2010
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Monday, February 22, 2010
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
The Twin Towers:
What Really Destroyed Them?
 |
| The South Tower's top first started to lean, then disintegrated before falling. |
Nearly everyone was shocked to see the towers explode into dust in mid-air, but we were not given any time to ask how this happened, as the official explanation was already at hand: the buildings, we were told, collapsed of their own weight.
We were told that no-one had ever anticipated fuel-laden jumbo-jets crashing into the towers, and that the jet fuel burned with the heat of a nuclear power plant and melted the steal columns of the towers' cores. Faced with the fact that a jet fuel fire could only reach a fraction of the temperature required to melt the buildings' structural steel, the "truss theory" was promoted. Later endorsed by FEMA, it holds that the fires weakened flimsy trusses supporting the floors, causing the floors to fall on one another in a chain-reaction.
This document examines fallacies in the official explanation:
- It is not consistent with the laws of physics.
- Its collapse scenario doesn't look anything like what happened.
- It misrepresents engineering practices and the Twin Towers' design.
- It was uninformed by any forensic analysis of the physical evidence.
Officials Destroyed the Physical Evidence.
After the disaster, the site was sealed off. People were threatened with arrest for merely taking pictures of Ground Zero. Officials running the "clean up" operation implemented a plan by Controlled Demolition Inc. to recycle the steel: the remains of the towers were shipped by scrap metal vendors to overseas blast furnaces, mainly in India and China. The vast majority of the structural steel was never seen by investigators, FEMA'sBuilding Assessment Performance Team, who were not even allowed access to Ground Zero.
The site of the vast crime that "changed everything", and of the largest and least understood structural failures in history, was not allowed to be examined for clues.
Nor can the public verify details about the buildings' design crucial to FEMA's theory, since the blueprints have not been released. The description of the towers' structure in their official report leaves over 20% of the steel known to have been used in their construction unaccounted for. By the time FEMA's report was published, Ground Zero had been scrubbed.
 |
| The towers easily survived the jet impacts. The impact holes quickly became dark, indicating absence of fires in the the towers' cores. |
The Towers Were Designed to Survive Large Jet Collisions.
Each tower was designed to survive the impact and fire from a collision by a 707-340 carrying 23,000 gallons of fuel. The similar- sized 767-200s that hit the towers were each carrying about 10,000 gallons of fuel.
Each tower was supported by both a palisade of columns forming its outer wall and a bundle of 47 massive steel columns in its core structure. Like all large engineered structures, the towers were over-engineered to support many times anticipated loads, to survive severe and improbable events, including bombings and fires. The plane crashes severed about 33 of the North Tower's and 24 of the South Tower's 240 perimeter columns. The South Tower impact trajectory suggests its core structure was barely damaged. Absent severe winds and earthquakes, each tower should have easily survived damage to even a majority of its columns. Each tower's crash and fire damage was limited to an asymmetrical minority of columns and a few floors. Yet each tower collapsed symmetrically, and into small pieces.
The Fires Were Not Unusually Severe.
Since jet fuel (kerosene) boils easily and its vapors ignite easily, it burns off rapidly. FEMA admits the fuel must have been used up within "a few minutes". Thereafter the fires burned fuels similar to those in ordinary office fires. The impact holes became dard shortly after each collision, and the smoke darkened over time -- a sign of oxygen-starved fires. After the South Tower had been hit, at least 18 people evacuated from above the impact zone down stairwells passing through it.
There is no evidence that, even at their hottest immediately after the impacts, the fires approached the 700 degrees C required to significantly soften steel. Such temperatures would have caused regions of the building to glow red hot in broad daylight. The oxygen-starved fires likely remained below 400 degrees C, and would be harmless to the steel frame even in the absence of insulation. There is no evidence that the fires ever damaged the core structures. Note that softening of steel by high temperatures is reversible, and that steel is a good conductor of heat. If any structural steel had lost strength in the first minutes of the fires, it would have regained most of it as the fires cooled after consuming the jet fuel.
Fires Don't Cause Skyscrapers to Collapse.
If WTC towers 1 and 2 and WTC 7 collapsed because of the fires it would be the first time in history that a steel-frame skyscraper totally collapsed because of fires or any other cause or combination of causes other than controlled demolition.
47-story WTC 7 sustained no impacts from aircraft or large falling objects, and only small fires were observed within it prior to its precisely vertical "collapse" into a small tidy rubble pile, 7 hours after the North Tower fell.
 |
| The South Tower exploded into dust, 56 minutes after the jet impact. |
Vertical Collapses Indicate Demolition.
The towers fell almost perfectly vertically, while spewing debris laterally. It is impossible that the aircraft impacts and fires could result in damage so perfectly synchronized and symmetrical as to cause the simultaneous and balanced failures in the structure required for such vertical collapses.
The official explanation that the outer wall channeled the collapse to within the building's footprint doesn't fit the reality that the outer wall was shredded before the bulk of the falling mass reached it. It also fails to acknowledge that the dense core would make the building's top fall like a tree.
The Towers Exploded.
In a gravity-driven collapse of the type we were told happened, the floors would crash down within the outer wall, and the wall's steel columns might buckle. The core would remain standing even if the outer wall fell apart.
The explosive disintegrations we witnessed don't look anything like that. Thick clouds of dust and debris are seen billowing from the towers even in the first seconds of their destructions when their tops were falling slowly. The remains of the towers consisted of scraps of metal, papers, and fine dust. The concrete, glass, gypsum, and other nonmetallic building constituents were thoroughly pulverized to microscopic particles.
The Towers Were Pulverized and Shredded in the Air.
The towers exploded into columns of dust resembling the pyroclastic flows of volcanoes. The thick clouds of pulverized concrete were ejected at regular intervals below the huge mushrooming clouds of dust that devoured each tower. Gravity might explain pulverization of concrete hitting the ground, but not in the air, and not in the early stage of each collapse when the top was moving slowly.
The steel box-beam grids of the buildings' outer walls were chopped onto small sections, and hurled tens and hundreds of feet, rather than peeling off. The massive steel box beams of the buildings' cores were also broken up into short pieces.
 |
| The North Tower was thoroughly pulverized in the air, creating a volcano-like cloud thick dust that expanded to several times the building's volume. |
The collapse of floors and buckling of the outer walls proposed by the "truss theory" cannot account for the conversion of the concrete into dust in mid-air, the fine chopping of the outer walls and hurling of their pieces hundreds of feet, or the complete destruction of the buildings' resilient cores.
The Towers' Tops Fell Without Resistance.
The towers fell at near the speed of a falling object encountering no resistance. Video recordings show both towers fell completely in about 15 seconds -- only slightly longer than would take an object to fall from the towers' roofs in a vacuum. But unless the intact portion of the building were demolished before the falling portion encountered it, it would have greatly slowed (and in fact halted) the fall, since the energy to crush each story and accelerate its mass downward would have to come from the kinetic energy of falling mass.
The towers could not have collapsed for the reasons cited, and if they could, they would not have exploded into dust and dropped at near free-fall speed.
Find detailed evidence about the Twin Towers' demolition
at these websites:
911research.wtc7.net
911research.wtc7.net/talks/towers/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)